Name: decimal
Owner: Spring Engineering
Description: Arbitrary-precision fixed-point decimal numbers in go
Created: 2015-02-25 20:12:57.0
Updated: 2018-01-20 12:45:27.0
Pushed: 2018-01-18 22:52:18.0
Size: 176
Language: Go
GitHub Committers
| User | Most Recent Commit | # Commits |
|---|
Other Committers
| User | Most Recent Commit | # Commits |
|---|
Arbitrary-precision fixed-point decimal numbers in go.
NOTE: can “only” represent numbers with a maximum of 2^31 digits after the decimal point.
Run go get github.com/shopspring/decimal
age main
rt (
"fmt"
"github.com/shopspring/decimal"
main() {
price, err := decimal.NewFromString("136.02")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
quantity := decimal.NewFromFloat(3)
fee, _ := decimal.NewFromString(".035")
taxRate, _ := decimal.NewFromString(".08875")
subtotal := price.Mul(quantity)
preTax := subtotal.Mul(fee.Add(decimal.NewFromFloat(1)))
total := preTax.Mul(taxRate.Add(decimal.NewFromFloat(1)))
fmt.Println("Subtotal:", subtotal) // Subtotal: 408.06
fmt.Println("Pre-tax:", preTax) // Pre-tax: 422.3421
fmt.Println("Taxes:", total.Sub(preTax)) // Taxes: 37.482861375
fmt.Println("Total:", total) // Total: 459.824961375
fmt.Println("Tax rate:", total.Sub(preTax).Div(preTax)) // Tax rate: 0.08875
http://godoc.org/github.com/shopspring/decimal
Because float64s (or any binary floating point type, actually) can't represent numbers such as 0.1 exactly.
Consider this code: http://play.golang.org/p/TQBd4yJe6B You might expect that
it prints out 10, but it actually prints 9.999999999999831. Over time,
these small errors can really add up!
big.Rat is fine for representing rational numbers, but Decimal is better for representing money. Why? Here's a (contrived) example:
Let's say you use big.Rat, and you have two numbers, x and y, both
representing 1/3, and you have z = 1 - x - y = 1/3. If you print each one
out, the string output has to stop somewhere (let's say it stops at 3 decimal
digits, for simplicity), so you'll get 0.333, 0.333, and 0.333. But where did
the other 0.001 go?
Here's the above example as code: http://play.golang.org/p/lCZZs0w9KE
With Decimal, the strings being printed out represent the number exactly. So,
if you have x = y = 1/3 (with precision 3), they will actually be equal to
0.333, and when you do z = 1 - x - y, z will be equal to .334. No money is
unaccounted for!
You still have to be careful. If you want to split a number N 3 ways, you
can't just send N/3 to three different people. You have to pick one to send
N - (2/3*N) to. That person will receive the fraction of a penny remainder.
But, it is much easier to be careful with Decimal than with big.Rat.
big.Int's API is built to reduce the number of memory allocations for maximal performance. This makes sense for its use-case, but the trade-off is that the API is awkward and easy to misuse.
For example, to add two big.Ints, you do: z := new(big.Int).Add(x, y). A
developer unfamiliar with this API might try to do z := a.Add(a, b). This
modifies a and sets z as an alias for a, which they might not expect. It
also modifies any other aliases to a.
Here's an example of the subtle bugs you can introduce with big.Int's API: https://play.golang.org/p/x2R_78pa8r
In contrast, it's difficult to make such mistakes with decimal. Decimals
behave like other go numbers types: even though a = b will not deep copy
b into a, it is impossible to modify a Decimal, since all Decimal methods
return new Decimals and do not modify the originals. The downside is that
this causes extra allocations, so Decimal is less performant. My assumption
is that if you're using Decimals, you probably care more about correctness
than performance.
The MIT License (MIT)
This is a heavily modified fork of fpd.Decimal, which was also released under the MIT License.