typesafehub/scala-logging

Name: scala-logging

Owner: Lightbend (Typesafe archive)

Owner: Lightbend

Description: Convenient and performant logging library for Scala wrapping SLF4J.

Created: 2013-07-16 20:24:15.0

Updated: 2018-01-17 13:10:28.0

Pushed: 2018-01-13 00:24:40.0

Homepage:

Size: 125

Language: Scala

GitHub Committers

UserMost Recent Commit# Commits

Other Committers

UserEmailMost Recent Commit# Commits

README

scala-logging Build Status

Scala Logging is a convenient and performant logging library wrapping SLF4J.

It's convenient, because you can simply call log methods, without checking whether the respective log level is enabled:

er.debug(s"Some $expensive message!")

It's performant, because thanks to Scala macros the check-enabled-idiom is applied and the following code is generated:

logger.isDebugEnabled) logger.debug(s"Some $expensive message!")
Prerequisites

A compatible logging backend is Logback, add it to your sbt build definition:

aryDependencies += "ch.qos.logback" % "logback-classic" % "1.2.3"

If you are looking for a version compatible with Scala 2.10, check out Scala Logging 2.x.

Getting Scala Logging

Scala Logging is published to Sonatype OSS and Maven Central:

Usage with SBT, adding a dependency to the latest version of Scala Logging to your sbt build definition file:

aryDependencies += "com.typesafe.scala-logging" %% "scala-logging" % "3.7.2"
Using Scala Logging

The Logger class from the com.typesafe.scalalogging package wraps an underlying SLF4J logger. In order to create a Logger, you pass a name to the apply factory method defined in the Logger companion object:

logger = Logger("name")

Or, you pass in a SLF4J logger instance:

logger = Logger(LoggerFactory.getLogger("name"))

Or, you pass in a class:

logger = Logger(classOf[MyClass])

Or, using the runtime class wrapped by the implicit class tag parameter:

logger = Logger[MyClass]

The LazyLogging and StrictLogging traits from the com.typesafe.scalalogging package define the logger member as a lazy or strict value respectively. In both cases the underlying SLF4J logger is named according to the class into which these traits are mixed:

s MyClass extends LazyLogging {
gger.debug("This is very convenient ;-)")

LoggerTakingImplicit provides the same methods as Logger class, but with additional implicit parameter A. During creation of the LoggerTakingImplicit evidence CanLog[A] is required. It may be useful when contextual parameter (e.g. Correlation ID) is being passed around and you would like to include it in the log messages:

 class CorrelationId(value: String)
icit case object CanLogCorrelationId extends CanLog[CorrelationId] {
erride def logMessage(originalMsg: String, a: CorrelationId): String = s"${a.value} $originalMsg"


icit val correlationId = CorrelationId("ID") 

logger = Logger.takingImplicit[CorrelationId]("test")
er.info("Test") // takes implicit correlationId and logs "ID Test"

It's possible to use MDC through CanLog without any troubles with execution context.

 class CorrelationId(value: String)
icit case object CanLogCorrelationId extends CanLog[CorrelationId] {
erride def logMessage(originalMsg: String, a: CorrelationId): String = {
MDC.put("correlationId", a.value)
originalMsg


erride def afterLog(a: A): Unit = {
MDC.remove("correlationId")



icit val correlationId = CorrelationId("ID") 

logger = Logger.takingImplicit[CorrelationId]("test")

serviceMethod(implicit correlationId: CorrelationId): Future[Result] = {
Call.map { value => 
logger.trace(s"Received value $value from db") // takes implicit correlationId
toResult(value)


What's new?
3.7.2 3.7.1 3.7.0 3.6.0 - flawed release 3.5.0 3.4.0 3.3.0 3.2.0
String Interpolation

It is idiomatic to use Scala's string interpolation logger.error(s"log $value") instead of SLF4J string interpolation logger.error("log {}", value). However there are some tools (such as Sentry) that use the log message format as grouping key. Therefore they do not work well with Scala's string interpolation.

Scala Logging replaces simple string interpolations with their SLF4J counterparts like this:

er.error(s"my log message: $arg1 $arg2 $arg3")
cala
er.error("my log message: {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3)

This has no effect on behavior and performace should be comparable (depends on the underlying logging library).

Limitations
Line numbers in log message?

Using the sourcecode library, it's possible to add line number information (especially useful for debugging):

foo(arg: String)(implicit line: sourcecode.Line, file: sourcecode.File) = {
. do something with arg ...
. do something with file.value ...


"hello") // the implicit sourcecode.File is filled in automatically
Debugging Scala in IntelliJ

Check out scala-trace-debug to make multithreaded bug tracing and prevention easier than ever. Provides user-friendly prints, traces, assertions, container printing, and source code printing.

Logstash

Check out logstash-logback-encoder if you're using Logstash. Provides logback encoders, layouts, and appenders to log in JSON format.

Other noteworthy tooling
Maintainer

The original author Heiko Seeberger stepped down Q1 2015, starting a new adventure at codecentric. Future maintenance is taken over by Mathias Bogaert.

Contribution policy

Contributions via GitHub pull requests are gladly accepted from their original author. Before we can accept pull requests, you will need to agree to the Typesafe Contributor License Agreement online, using your GitHub account.

License

This code is open source software licensed under the Apache 2.0 License.


This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number U24TR002306. This work is solely the responsibility of the creators and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.